Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 0 month(s) later
2444.4x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 43.2 GTexel / s
6x more pipelines: 768 vs 128
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 65 nm
6.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 100 Watt

Launch date	2 Sep 2020 vs 14 August 2008
Texture fill rate	105.6 GTexel/s vs 43.2 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 128
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 100 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

2.3x more core clock speed: 675 MHz vs 300 MHz

Core clock speed	675 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1219
PassMark - G3D Mark		575
PassMark - G2D Mark		42
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3272
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3272

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU	NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.0	Tesla
Code name	Tiger Lake GT2	G92
Launch date	2 Sep 2020	14 August 2008
Place in performance rating	1426	1423
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz
Compute units	96
Core clock speed	300 MHz	675 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	65 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	422.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	3.379 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1.690 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	128
Pixel fill rate	26.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	105.6 GTexel/s	43.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	100 Watt
Floating-point performance		422.4 gflops
Transistor count		754 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	MXM-B (3.0)
Width	IGP
Laptop size		large
API support
DirectX	12.1	10.0
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		1 GB
Memory bandwidth		64.0 GB / s
Memory bus width		256 Bit
Memory clock speed		2000 MHz
Memory type		GDDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
CUDA
PowerMizer 8.0