Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and NVIDIA Quadro K620M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
5873.2x more texture fill rate: 105.6 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt

Launch date	2 Sep 2020 vs 1 March 2015
Texture fill rate	105.6 GTexel/s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 30 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K620M

3.4x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz

Core clock speed	1029 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz vs 1100 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K620M

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU	NVIDIA Quadro K620M
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	1234
PassMark - G3D Mark		1165
PassMark - G2D Mark		158
Geekbench - OpenCL		4583
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		23.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		165.904
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		91.813
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		1291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		1349
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		1291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		927
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		1349

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU	NVIDIA Quadro K620M
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.0	Maxwell
Code name	Tiger Lake GT2	GM108
Launch date	2 Sep 2020	1 March 2015
Place in performance rating	1426	1429
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1100 MHz	1124 MHz
Compute units	96
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1029 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	422.4 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	3.379 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	1.690 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	384
Pixel fill rate	26.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	105.6 GTexel/s	17.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	30 Watt
Floating-point performance		863.2 gflops
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port		1.2
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x1	MXM-A (3.0)
Width	IGP
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		2 GB
Memory bandwidth		14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width		64 Bit
Memory clock speed		1800 MHz
Memory type		DDR3
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
nView Display Management
Optimus