Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1219 MHz
• 2030.2x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 39.01 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 10611
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 4551
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 4551

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

• 3.1x more core clock speed: 925 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2.8x more memory clock speed: 6000 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3607 vs 3462
• Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3607 vs 3462
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3214
• Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3214
• Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 432 vs 311
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2629 vs 1972

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon PRO WX 3100

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	14238 10611
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6889 4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	6889 4551
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3462 3607
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3462 3607
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3214 3359
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3214 3359
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	311 432
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1972 2629

Compare specifications (specs)