Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs Intel UHD Graphics 620
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and Intel UHD Graphics 620 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 43% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1150 MHz
- 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 3.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 4592
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 1397
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 1397
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3462 vs 878
- 3.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3462 vs 878
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3214 vs 2227
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3214 vs 2227
- Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 311 vs 241
- Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1972 vs 1042
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 1 September 2017 |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1150 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 24 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 vs 4592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 vs 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 vs 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 vs 2227 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 vs 241 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 vs 1042 |
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 620
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 25 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 32 GB vs 4 GB
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB vs 4 GB |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 620
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Intel UHD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 4592 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 1397 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 2227 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 2227 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 241 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 1042 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.062 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 273.504 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.777 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.939 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 31.881 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 62 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | Intel UHD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Generation 9.5 |
| Code name | DG1 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 1 September 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 523 | 1380 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1150 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 24 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 32 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 / DDR4 |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
