Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1417 MHz
1164.4x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt

Launch date	31 Oct 2020 vs 3 January 2018
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz vs 1417 MHz
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 14 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 75 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

3.8x more core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 300 MHz
3.3x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Around 43% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19887 vs 13898
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 6889
Around 17% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 6889
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3579 vs 3462
Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3579 vs 3462
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3214
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3214
Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 347 vs 311
2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5324 vs 1972

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1152 MHz vs 300 MHz
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	19887 vs 13898
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8059 vs 6889
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8059 vs 6889
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3579 vs 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3579 vs 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3358 vs 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3358 vs 3214
PassMark - G2D Mark	347 vs 311
PassMark - G3D Mark	5324 vs 1972

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

13898

19887

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

8059

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

8059

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

3579

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

3579

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

3358

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

3358

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

311

347

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1972

5324

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL	13898	19887
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889	8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889	8059
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3462	3579
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3462	3579
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3214	3358
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3214	3358
PassMark - G2D Mark	311	347
PassMark - G3D Mark	1972	5324
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		54.188
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1159.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.507
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		82.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		293.638
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2219

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.1	Pascal
Code name	DG1	GP107
Launch date	31 Oct 2020	3 January 2018
Place in performance rating	531	532
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz	1417 MHz
Compute units	96
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1152 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.534 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	768
Pixel fill rate	39.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s	68.02 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	75 Watt
Floating-point performance		2,177 gflops
Transistor count		3,300 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	IGP
Laptop size		medium sized
Supplementary power connectors		None
API support
DirectX	12.1	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bandwidth	68.26 GB/s	112.1 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)	7008 MHz
Memory type	LPDDR4X	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready