Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1250 MHz
- 883.9x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 12x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 300 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 71% higher memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 31 January 2012 |
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950
- 2.3x more pipelines: 1792 vs 768
- 5.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 82144 vs 13898
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 vs 6889
- Around 16% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 vs 6889
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3462
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3462
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3214
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3214
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 768 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 vs 13898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 vs 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 vs 6889 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3462 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3214 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3214 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 13898 | 82144 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3359 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | DG1 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 31 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 531 | 528 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Compute units | 96 | 28 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 1792 |
Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 300 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 2,867 gflops | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Width | IGP | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 11 |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 240 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
ZeroCore |