Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1188 MHz
- 1609.8x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 49.2 billion / sec
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 90 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 355.5x more memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 6.6 GB/s
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 6803
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 6803
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 20 August 2015 |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1188 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 49.2 billion / sec |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 90 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 6.6 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 6803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 6803 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16715 vs 13898
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3697 vs 3462
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3697 vs 3462
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3214
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 642 vs 311
- 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5343 vs 1972
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16715 vs 13898 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3697 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3697 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3214 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 642 vs 311 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5343 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 13898 | 16715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 6803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 6803 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 642 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 5343 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 60.473 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 758.865 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.279 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.738 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 231.508 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1863 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | DG1 | GM206 |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 20 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 531 | 533 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $159 | |
| Price now | $194.44 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 30.06 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1188 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 49.2 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 90 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 768 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,825 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2 |
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 7.938" (20.2 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| SLI options | 2x | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pins | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 105.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 6.6 GB/s |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive Vertical Sync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| SLI | ||
| Surround | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce PCX 5750
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 770
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
