Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA GeForce MX350
Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA GeForce MX350 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
- Around 12% higher boost clock speed: 1650 MHz vs 1468 MHz
- Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective)
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 14238 vs 13562
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 4655
- Around 48% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 4655
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 311 vs 235
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 vs 10 Feb 2020 |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz vs 1468 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 640 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) vs 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 vs 13562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 vs 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 vs 4655 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 vs 235 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX350
- 4.5x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 25 Watt
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3462
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3462
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3214
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3214
- Around 42% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2807 vs 1972
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 25 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 3462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3214 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3214 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2807 vs 1972 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX350
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 14238 | 13562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6889 | 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6889 | 4655 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3462 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3462 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3214 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3214 | 3356 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 235 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1972 | 2807 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1247 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX | NVIDIA GeForce MX350 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Pascal |
| Code name | DG1 | GP107 |
| Launch date | 31 Oct 2020 | 10 Feb 2020 |
| Place in performance rating | 523 | 654 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | 1468 MHz |
| Compute units | 96 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1354 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 633.6 GFLOPS (1:4) | 58.72 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.069 TFLOPS (2:1) | 29.36 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.534 TFLOPS | 1.879 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
| Pixel fill rate | 39.60 GPixel/s | 23.49 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 79.20 GTexel/s | 46.98 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3300 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | IGP | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | |
| OpenCL | 2.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 68.26 GB/s | 56.06 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective) | 1752 MHz (7008 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX with others
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 565v
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7850
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon HD 7870 XT
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
AMDRadeon R9 370X
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAQuadro P1000 Mobile
IntelIris Xe Graphics MAX vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX450
