Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX and NVIDIA Quadro M4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX

Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 4 month(s) later
985.2x more texture fill rate: 79.20 GTexel/s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
4.8x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 120 Watt
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6889 vs 6291
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6889 vs 6291

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	31 Oct 2020 vs 29 June 2015
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s vs 80.39 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt vs 120 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889 vs 6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889 vs 6291

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M4000

2.6x more core clock speed: 773 MHz vs 300 MHz
2.2x more pipelines: 1664 vs 768
2x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 4 GB
2.8x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18372 vs 13711
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3462
Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3462
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3332 vs 3214
Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3332 vs 3214
2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 672 vs 311
3.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6673 vs 1972

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	773 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines	1664 vs 768
Maximum memory size	8 GB vs 4 GB
Memory clock speed	6008 MHz vs 2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	18372 vs 13711
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3685 vs 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3685 vs 3462
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3332 vs 3214
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3332 vs 3214
PassMark - G2D Mark	672 vs 311
PassMark - G3D Mark	6673 vs 1972

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M4000

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

13711

18372

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

6291

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6889

6291

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3462

3685

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

3332

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3214

3332

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

311

672

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1972

6673

Name	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Geekbench - OpenCL	13711	18372
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	6889	6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	6889	6291
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3462	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3462	3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3214	3332
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3214	3332
PassMark - G2D Mark	311	672
PassMark - G3D Mark	1972	6673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		65.548
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		732.046
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		5.453
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		17.725
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		217.357
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		2302

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel Iris Xe Graphics MAX	NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.1	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	DG1	GM204
Launch date	31 Oct 2020	29 June 2015
Place in performance rating	526	523
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$791
Price now		$765.93
Value for money (0-100)		10.68
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz
Compute units	96
Core clock speed	300 MHz	773 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	633.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	5.069 TFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	2.534 TFLOPS
Pipelines	768	1664
Pixel fill rate	39.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	79.20 GTexel/s	80.39 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	25 Watt	120 Watt
Floating-point performance		2,573 gflops
Transistor count		5,200 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	4x DisplayPort, DP DP DP DP 3-pin Stereo
Multi-display synchronization		Quadro Sync
Number of simultaneous displays		4
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x4	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	IGP	1" (2.5 cm)
Length		241 mm
SLI options		1
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.1	12
OpenCL	2.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Shader Model	6.4	5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bandwidth	68.26 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	2133 MHz (4.3 Gbps effective)	6008 MHz
Memory type	LPDDR4X	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Vision Pro
High-Performance Video I/O6
Mosaic
nView Desktop Management