Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 11 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
• 6x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 30 Watt
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 322 vs 140
• 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 34
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 1586
• Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 1586

Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

• 2.5x more core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 200 MHz
• 10x more pipelines: 120 vs 12

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3650

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	322 140
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	94 34
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1586
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 1586

Compare specifications (specs)