Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs AMD Radeon HD 8250

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and AMD Radeon HD 8250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • Around 88% higher boost clock speed: 750 MHz vs 400 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 212
  • Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 93 vs 59
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 476 vs 384
  • Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1000 vs 628
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 1343
  • Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 476 vs 384
  • Around 59% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1000 vs 628
  • Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 1343
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 11 December 2017 vs 1 June 2013
Boost clock speed 750 MHz vs 400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 28 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 320 vs 212
PassMark - G2D Mark 93 vs 59
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 476 vs 384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1000 vs 628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1701 vs 1343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 476 vs 384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1000 vs 628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1701 vs 1343

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8250

  • Around 50% higher core clock speed: 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
  • 10.7x more pipelines: 128 vs 12
  • Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1075 vs 1001
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 300 MHz vs 200 MHz
Pipelines 128 vs 12
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL 1075 vs 1001

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8250

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
320
212
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
93
59
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
1001
1075
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
476
384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1000
628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1701
1343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
476
384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1000
628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1701
1343
Name Intel UHD Graphics 600 AMD Radeon HD 8250
PassMark - G3D Mark 320 212
PassMark - G2D Mark 93 59
Geekbench - OpenCL 1001 1075
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 7.529
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 75.815
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.178
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 11.584
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 476 384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1000 628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1701 1343
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 476 384
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1000 628
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1701 1343
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 600 AMD Radeon HD 8250

Essentials

Architecture Generation 9.5 GCN
Code name Gemini Lake GT1 Temash
Launch date 11 December 2017 1 June 2013
Place in performance rating 1617 1620
Type Laptop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 750 MHz 400 MHz
Core clock speed 200 MHz 300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 12 128
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 5 Watt
Transistor count 189 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x1

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 11.1
OpenGL 4.5

Memory

Memory bus width 64 / 128 Bit
Memory type DDR4 / LPDDR4
Shared memory 1 1

Technologies

Quick Sync