Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8200

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA GeForce 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 80 nm
• 8x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 40 Watt
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 320 vs 156
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 93 vs 71
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 600
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 600

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8200

• 2.5x more core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 200 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8200

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	320 156
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	93 71
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 600
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 600

Compare specifications (specs)