Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 600

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
• 13x lower typical power consumption: 5 Watt vs 65 Watt
• Around 89% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 322 vs 170
• Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 94 vs 74
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 1701 vs 486
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1701 vs 486

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500

• Around 63% higher core clock speed: 325 MHz vs 200 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	322 170
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	94 74
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 486
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1701 486

Compare specifications (specs)