Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and AMD Radeon RX 550 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1241 vs 940
- Around 32% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1241 vs 940
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 18 April 2017 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 vs 940 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 550
- 3.7x more core clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 13% higher boost clock speed: 1183 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 3.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 693
- 2.8x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 171
- 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 2697
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 1071
- 4.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 1071
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2158 vs 1699
- Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2158 vs 1699
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1100 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1183 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 693 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 vs 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2158 vs 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2158 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 2690 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 476 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 | 11610 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 2158 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | Lexa |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 18 April 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 1350 | 876 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN generation | 4th Gen | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $79 | |
Price now | $75 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | 1183 MHz |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 2,200 million |
Floating-point performance | 1.2 TFLOPs | |
Pipelines | 512 | |
Texture fill rate | 37.86 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7000 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |