Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 693 vs 681
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2697 vs 2473
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 15 May 2012 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 vs 681 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 vs 2473 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- 2.7x more core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 171
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1151 vs 1071
- Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1151 vs 1071
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1853 vs 1241
- Around 49% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1853 vs 1241
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2073 vs 1699
- Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2073 vs 1699
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 vs 171 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1151 vs 1071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1151 vs 1071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1853 vs 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1853 vs 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2073 vs 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2073 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 681 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 225 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 | 2473 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 1151 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 1853 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 2073 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 2073 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.498 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 140.06 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.502 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 9.613 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.49 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 170 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | GF108 |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 15 May 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 1350 | 1440 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | |
| Price now | $99.21 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 8.89 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
| Floating-point performance | 311.0 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 96 | |
| Texture fill rate | 12.96 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 610 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9000
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 9800
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 570M
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640M
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8400 IGP
IntelUHD Graphics 610 vs
AMDRadeon 660M
