Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 49 Watt
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 18 June 2014 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 49 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
- 2.3x more core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 830 vs 693
- Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 253 vs 171
- Around 8% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 2902 vs 2697
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1951 vs 1071
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1951 vs 1071
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1693 vs 1241
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1693 vs 1241
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3324 vs 1699
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3324 vs 1699
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 700 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 830 vs 693 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 253 vs 171 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2902 vs 2697 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1951 vs 1071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1951 vs 1071 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1693 vs 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1693 vs 1241 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3324 vs 1699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3324 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 830 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 253 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 | 2902 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 1951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 1693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 3324 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 3324 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.872 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.832 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.817 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.415 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 36.916 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 327 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi |
| Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | GF108 |
| Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 18 June 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 1350 | 1311 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $59.99 | |
| Price now | $54.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 20.48 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 49 Watt |
| Transistor count | 189 million | 585 million |
| Floating-point performance | 692.7 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 14.43 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 145 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 40.1 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |

