Intel UHD Graphics 610 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 610 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 610
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
- 7.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 116 Watt
Launch date | 3 April 2018 vs 15 March 2011 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 116 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
- 6x more core clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1557 vs 693
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 382 vs 171
- 2.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5750 vs 2697
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2488 vs 1071
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2488 vs 1071
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3351 vs 1241
- 2.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3351 vs 1241
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3322 vs 1699
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3322 vs 1699
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1557 vs 693 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 382 vs 171 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5750 vs 2697 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2488 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2488 vs 1071 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3351 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3351 vs 1241 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3322 vs 1699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3322 vs 1699 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 610
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 693 | 1557 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | 382 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 2697 | 5750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1071 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1071 | 2488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1241 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1241 | 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1699 | 3322 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1699 | 3322 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.392 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.125 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 18.511 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 41.941 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 322 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 610 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | Coffee Lake GT1 | GF116 |
Launch date | 3 April 2018 | 15 March 2011 |
Place in performance rating | 1350 | 1019 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | |
Price now | $287.59 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 7.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1050 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 40 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 116 Watt |
Transistor count | 189 million | 1,170 million |
CUDA cores | 192 | |
Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
Pipelines | 192 | |
Texture fill rate | 28.8 billion / sec | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | Two Dual Link DVI-IMini HDMI, 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Bus support | 16x PCI-E 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 8.25" (21 cm) | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | One 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 98.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1026 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
SLI |