Intel UHD Graphics 730 vs AMD Radeon R5 M330
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 730 and AMD Radeon R5 M330 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 730
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1030 MHz
- 757.3x more texture fill rate: 15.60 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 18 Watt
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1573 vs 596
- Around 2% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5967 vs 5874
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2429 vs 1155
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5221 vs 1850
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2691
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2429 vs 1155
- 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5221 vs 1850
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2691
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 5 May 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz vs 1030 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s vs 20.6 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 18 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 vs 596 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 vs 5874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 vs 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 2691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 vs 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 vs 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 2691 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M330
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 955 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 519 vs 412
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 955 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Pipelines | 320 vs 192 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 vs 412 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 730
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M330
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD Radeon R5 M330 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1573 | 596 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 412 | 519 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5967 | 5874 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2429 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5221 | 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 2691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2429 | 1155 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5221 | 1850 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 2691 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 603 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 69.096 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 730 | AMD Radeon R5 M330 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | Exo |
Launch date | 2021 | 5 May 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 633 | 926 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R5 300 Series | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | 1030 MHz |
Compute units | 24 | 5 |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 955 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 998.4 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 499.2 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 15.60 GTexel/s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 18 Watt |
Floating-point performance | 659.2 gflops | |
Transistor count | 1,040 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | Not Listed |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mantle | ||
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 bit |
Shared memory | 1 | 0 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
DualGraphics | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Switchable graphics | ||
ZeroCore |