Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 16 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- 10400x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 2 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 20 Watt
- 157.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1736 vs 11
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 348 vs 283
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 1 January 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 2 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 130 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 20 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1736 vs 11 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 vs 283 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
- Around 67% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 300 MHz
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1736 | 11 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 | 283 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6684 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics 750 | ATI FireMV 2400 PCIe x1 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Rage 9 |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | RV380 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 1 January 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 596 | 586 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 2 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 20 Watt |
| Transistor count | 75 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x VHDCI |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0b |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3 | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics 750 with others
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GT
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 1500M
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
AMDRadeon R9 255 OEM
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 945A
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P600
IntelUHD Graphics 750 vs
NVIDIAT1000
