Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs ATI Radeon X1050

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and ATI Radeon X1050 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 18 year(s) 6 month(s) later
  • 13000x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
  • Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 24 Watt
  • 35.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1724 vs 49
  • Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 364 vs 245
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 2021 vs 7 December 2006
Texture fill rate 20.80 GTexel/s vs 1.6 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm vs 110 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 24 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1724 vs 49
PassMark - G2D Mark 364 vs 245

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X1050

  • Around 33% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed 400 MHz vs 300 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X1050

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1724
49
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
364
245
Name Intel UHD Graphics 750 ATI Radeon X1050
PassMark - G3D Mark 1724 49
PassMark - G2D Mark 364 245
Geekbench - OpenCL 6447
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 35.179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 543.594
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 1.995
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 29.322
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 11068
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2899
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3219
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 11068
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 641

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 750 ATI Radeon X1050

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.1 Rage 9
Code name Rocket Lake GT1 RV370
Launch date 2021 7 December 2006
Place in performance rating 748 745
Type Desktop Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1300 MHz
Compute units 32
Core clock speed 300 MHz 400 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 110 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1331 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 665.6 GFLOPS
Pipelines 256
Pixel fill rate 10.40 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 20.80 GTexel/s 1.6 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 24 Watt
Transistor count 107 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 9.0
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 2.0
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 128 MB
Memory bandwidth 5.33 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 666 MHz
Memory type DDR2