Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs ATI Radeon HD 5850

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and ATI Radeon HD 5850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 15 year(s) 1 month(s) later
• Around 79% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 725 MHz
• 398.5x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 52.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 10.1x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 151 Watt
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 vs 16.467
• Around 29% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.995 vs 1.541
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3358
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 5850

• 2.4x more core clock speed: 725 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 5.6x more pipelines: 1440 vs 256
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1970 vs 1726
• Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 400 vs 351
• 5.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33977 vs 6483
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1109.612 vs 543.594
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.08 vs 29.322
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3806 vs 2899
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3219
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3806 vs 2899
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3219

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5850

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1726 1970
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	351 400
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6483 33977
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.179 16.467
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543.594 1109.612
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.995 1.541
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.322 42.08
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 3806
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 3806
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3358

Compare specifications (specs)