Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2070

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA Tesla C2070 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 646x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 32.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 40 nm
• 15.9x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 238 Watt
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 vs 26.223
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3351
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3351

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2070

• Around 92% higher core clock speed: 575 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 75% higher pipelines: 448 vs 256
• Around 80% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3121 vs 1730
• Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 462 vs 354
• Around 50% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9716 vs 6463
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 908.754 vs 543.594
• Around 51% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.015 vs 1.995
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.519 vs 29.322
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3245 vs 2899
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3710 vs 3219
• Around 12% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3245 vs 2899
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3710 vs 3219

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C2070

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1730 3121
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	354 462
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6463 9716
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.179 26.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543.594 908.754
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.995 3.015
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.322 43.519
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3351
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 3245
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3351

Compare specifications (specs)