Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs ATI Radeon X600 SE
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and ATI Radeon X600 SE videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 20 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 16000x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 1.3 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 110 nm
- 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 36 Watt
- 35.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1729 vs 49
- Around 55% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 229
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2021 vs 1 September 2004 |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s vs 1.3 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 110 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 36 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1729 vs 49 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 vs 229 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X600 SE
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 325 MHz vs 300 MHz
Core clock speed | 325 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: ATI Radeon X600 SE
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | ATI Radeon X600 SE |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1729 | 49 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 355 | 229 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6466 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 35.179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 543.594 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.995 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 29.322 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3219 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 11068 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2899 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3219 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 11068 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 641 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics 750 | ATI Radeon X600 SE | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Rage 9 |
Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | RV370 |
Launch date | 2021 | 1 September 2004 |
Place in performance rating | 763 | 762 |
Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1300 MHz | |
Compute units | 32 | |
Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 325 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 110 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 166.4 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1331 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 665.6 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 256 | |
Pixel fill rate | 10.40 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 20.80 GTexel/s | 1.3 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 36 Watt |
Transistor count | 107 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | |
Memory type | DDR |