Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GRID K520

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GRID K520 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 9.9x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 2x 102.0 GTexel / s billion / sec
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 15x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 225 Watt
• 2.3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 160
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 35.179 vs 20.97
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3354
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3354

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K520

• 2.5x more core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 12x more pipelines: 2x 1536 vs 256
• 2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3516 vs 1724
• Around 68% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10864 vs 6464
• Around 96% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1063.784 vs 543.594
• Around 63% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.244 vs 1.995
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 42.277 vs 29.322
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6782 vs 2899
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3713 vs 3219
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6782 vs 2899
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3713 vs 3219

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K520

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1724 3516
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	361 160
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6464 10864
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.179 20.97
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543.594 1063.784
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.995 3.244
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.322 42.277
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 6782
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 6782
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3354

Compare specifications (specs)