Intel UHD Graphics 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 750 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 750

• Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1300 MHz vs 1176 MHz
• 442.2x more texture fill rate: 20.80 GTexel/s vs 47.04 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 45% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 355 vs 245
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 11068 vs 3358
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 11068 vs 3358

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

• 3.7x more core clock speed: 1096 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
• Around 95% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3370 vs 1729
• Around 70% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10976 vs 6466
• Around 54% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 54.294 vs 35.179
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 795.325 vs 543.594
• Around 85% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.692 vs 1.995
• Around 77% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 51.794 vs 29.322
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5264 vs 2899
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3219
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5264 vs 2899
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3219
• Around 92% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1231 vs 641

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 750
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1729 3370
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	355 245
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	6466 10976
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.179 54.294
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	543.594 795.325
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.995 3.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	29.322 51.794
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2899 5264
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3219 3714
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	11068 3358
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	641 1231

Compare specifications (specs)