Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce 920M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • 1871x more texture fill rate: 23.20 GTexel/s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
  • 4.5x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 532 vs 119
  • 2.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1908 vs 716
  • 2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 7628 vs 3722
  • 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 46.442 vs 8.358
  • 6.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 157.606
  • 3.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.846 vs 0.843
  • 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.941 vs 15.374
  • 2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 94.384 vs 40.443
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 4 Nov 2021 vs 13 March 2015
Texture fill rate 23.20 GTexel/s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 33 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 532 vs 119
PassMark - G3D Mark 1908 vs 716
Geekbench - OpenCL 7628 vs 3722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.442 vs 8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1011.7 vs 157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.846 vs 0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 40.941 vs 15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.384 vs 40.443

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 920M

  • 3.2x more core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 300 MHz
  • Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
  • 4.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 vs 72
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 954 MHz vs 300 MHz
Pipelines 384 vs 256
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 326 vs 72

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 920M

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
532
119
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1908
716
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
7628
3722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
46.442
8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1011.7
157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2.846
0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
40.941
15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
94.384
40.443
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
72
326
Name Intel UHD Graphics 770 NVIDIA GeForce 920M
PassMark - G2D Mark 532 119
PassMark - G3D Mark 1908 716
Geekbench - OpenCL 7628 3722
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 46.442 8.358
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1011.7 157.606
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.846 0.843
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 40.941 15.374
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 94.384 40.443
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 72 326
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3358
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1598
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3636
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3358

Compare specifications (specs)

Intel UHD Graphics 770 NVIDIA GeForce 920M

Essentials

Architecture Generation 12.2 Kepler 2.0
Code name Alder Lake GT1 GK208B
Launch date 4 Nov 2021 13 March 2015
Place in performance rating 832 1297
Type Desktop Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1450 MHz
Compute units 32
Core clock speed 300 MHz 954 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 10 nm 28 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 185.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 1485 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 742.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines 256 384
Pixel fill rate 11.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 23.20 GTexel/s 12.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 33 Watt
Floating-point performance 297.6 gflops
Transistor count 585 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 4.5
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x8

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz
Memory type DDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
CUDA
GameWorks
GPU Boost
Optimus
Verde Drivers