Intel UHD Graphics 770 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics 770 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

Intel UHD Graphics 770

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 770

Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 9 month(s) later
388.5x more texture fill rate: 23.20 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 16 nm
5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 505 vs 292
Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1011.7 vs 799.414
Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 40.941 vs 30.523

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	4 Nov 2021 vs 1 February 2017
Texture fill rate	23.20 GTexel/s vs 59.72 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm vs 16 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt vs 75 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	505 vs 292
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1011.7 vs 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	40.941 vs 30.523

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

4.5x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 300 MHz
Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1450 MHz
2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
2.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 1880
2.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17455 vs 7653
Around 45% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 46.442
Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 2.846
2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 223.683 vs 94.384
2.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2089 vs 739

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1354 MHz vs 300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1493 MHz vs 1450 MHz
Pipelines	640 vs 256
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	4462 vs 1880
Geekbench - OpenCL	17455 vs 7653
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	67.209 vs 46.442
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	4.536 vs 2.846
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	223.683 vs 94.384
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2089 vs 739

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 770
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

505

292

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

1880

4462

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

7653

17455

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

46.442

67.209

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1011.7

799.414

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2.846

4.536

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

40.941

30.523

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

94.384

223.683

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

739

2089

Name	Intel UHD Graphics 770	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
PassMark - G2D Mark	505	292
PassMark - G3D Mark	1880	4462
Geekbench - OpenCL	7653	17455
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	46.442	67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1011.7	799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.846	4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	40.941	30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	94.384	223.683
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	739	2089
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3359
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		7239
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3721
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3359

Compare specifications (specs)

	Intel UHD Graphics 770	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
Essentials
Architecture	Generation 12.2	Pascal
Code name	Alder Lake GT1	GP106B
Launch date	4 Nov 2021	1 February 2017
Place in performance rating	828	644
Type	Desktop	Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1450 MHz	1493 MHz
Compute units	32
Core clock speed	300 MHz	1354 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	10 nm	16 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	185.6 GFLOPS (1:4)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	1485 GFLOPS (2:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	742.4 GFLOPS
Pipelines	256	640
Pixel fill rate	11.60 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	23.20 GTexel/s	59.72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	15 Watt	75 Watt
Floating-point performance		1,911 gflops
Transistor count		4,400 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.4
Vulkan
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface		PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size		large
Memory
Maximum RAM amount		4 GB
Memory bandwidth		112.1 GB / s
Memory bus width		128 Bit
Memory clock speed		7008 MHz
Memory type		GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection