Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 16 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 vs 1 February 2017 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3336 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- 5x more core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1100 MHz
- 24x more pipelines: 768 vs 32
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 1887
- 4.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 1887
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 3505
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 3505
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 32 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 3505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 3505 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Pascal |
| Code name | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GP106B |
| Launch date | 28 May 2019 | 1 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 859 | 533 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1100 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | Yes | 0 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) with others
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X1600 XT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIFirePro V5800
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
AMDRadeon 540
