Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 10 nm versus 16 nm
- 3x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 25 Watt versus 75 Watt
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 versus 1 February 2017 |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt versus 75 Watt |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3336 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- 5x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 47% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- 24x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 32
- 4.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 1887
- 4.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 1887
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 versus 3505
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 versus 3505
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 32 |
| Référence | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 1887 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 versus 3505 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 versus 3505 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1887 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1887 | 8496 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3505 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3505 | 3687 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3336 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Intel Gen. 11 (Ice Lake) | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11 | GP106B |
| Date de sortie | 28 May 2019 | 1 February 2017 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 859 | 533 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1100 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 300 MHz | 1493 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 10 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 32 | 768 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| Genre de mémoire | DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | Yes | 0 |
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIRadeon X1600 XT
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
ATIFirePro V5800
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
AMDRadeon HD 6790
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 650
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
NVIDIAGeForce MX250
IntelUHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs
AMDRadeon 540
