Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P630
- 32x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2010 vs 1105
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2273 vs 1974
- Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2010 vs 1105
- Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2273 vs 1974
Specifications (specs) | |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 329 vs 328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 vs 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 vs 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 vs 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 vs 1974 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- 2x more core clock speed: 706 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 48x more pipelines: 1152 vs 24
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2762 vs 2100
- Around 57% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8833 vs 5643
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.487 vs 20.49
- Around 55% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 600.985 vs 387.561
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.281 vs 2.089
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.452 vs 24.713
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 61.984 vs 37.743
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3246 vs 3019
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3246 vs 3019
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 706 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 1152 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2762 vs 2100 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8833 vs 5643 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 vs 20.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 vs 387.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 vs 2.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 vs 24.713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 vs 37.743 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 vs 3019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 vs 3019 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2100 | 2762 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 329 | 328 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5643 | 8833 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | 24.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | 600.985 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | 2.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3246 |
Compare specifications (specs)
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Place in performance rating | 1082 | 1084 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Architecture | Kepler | |
Code name | GK104 | |
Launch date | 23 July 2013 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Price now | $379.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 706 MHz |
Pipelines | 24 | 1152 |
Floating-point performance | 1,627 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
Texture fill rate | 67.78 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 128 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 3200 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Laptop size | large |