Intel UHD Graphics P630 vs AMD Radeon 530
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P630 and AMD Radeon 530 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, API support, Memory, Technologies, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P630
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1024 MHz
- 32x more maximum memory size: 128 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 97% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2030 vs 1028
- Around 86% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 327 vs 176
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 5639 vs 5015
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2273 vs 2246
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2273 vs 2246
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 1024 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2030 vs 1028 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 vs 176 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5639 vs 5015 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 vs 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 vs 2246 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon 530
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1024 MHz vs 350 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2021 vs 2010
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 3019
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2021 vs 2010
- Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 3019
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1024 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2021 vs 2010 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3019 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2021 vs 2010 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3019 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon 530
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon 530 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2030 | 1028 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 327 | 176 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5639 | 5015 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 2021 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 2246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 506 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics P630 | AMD Radeon 530 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Place in performance rating | 1095 | 1096 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop, Laptop |
| Architecture | GCN | |
| Code name | Meso | |
| Design | Radeon 500 Series | |
| GCN generation | 3rd Gen | |
| Launch date | 18 April 2017 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Compute units | 6 | |
| Floating-point performance | 800 GFLOPs | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | |
| Pixel fill rate | 8.20 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 8 | |
| Stream Processors | 320/384 | |
| Texture fill rate | 24.58 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 20/24 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 128 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 48 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR3/GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| AMD Graphics Core Next (GCN) Architecture | ||
| AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| TressFX | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
| Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics P630 with others
IntelUHD Graphics P630 vs
ATIRadeon 9700
IntelUHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5500
IntelUHD Graphics P630 vs
ATIFireMV 2200 PCI
IntelUHD Graphics P630 vs
AMDRadeon R6 M340DX
IntelUHD Graphics P630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 940MX
IntelUHD Graphics P630 vs
AMDRadeon 530
