Intel UHD Graphics P630 versus NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics P630 and NVIDIA Quadro K4100M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics P630
- 32x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 128 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2010 versus 1105
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2273 versus 1974
- Environ 82% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2010 versus 1105
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2273 versus 1974
Caractéristiques | |
Taille de mémore maximale | 128 GB versus 4 GB |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 versus 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 versus 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 versus 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 versus 1974 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
- 2x plus de vitesse du noyau: 706 MHz versus 350 MHz
- 48x plus de pipelines: 1152 versus 24
- Environ 38% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2762 versus 2004
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 8810 versus 5640
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 24.487 versus 20.49
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 600.985 versus 387.561
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.281 versus 2.089
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 35.452 versus 24.713
- Environ 64% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 61.984 versus 37.743
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3246 versus 3019
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3246 versus 3019
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 706 MHz versus 350 MHz |
Pipelines | 1152 versus 24 |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2762 versus 2004 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 8810 versus 5640 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 24.487 versus 20.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 600.985 versus 387.561 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.281 versus 2.089 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 35.452 versus 24.713 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 61.984 versus 37.743 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3246 versus 3019 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3246 versus 3019 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P630
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4100M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2004 | 2762 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 328 | 328 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5640 | 8810 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.49 | 24.487 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 387.561 | 600.985 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.089 | 2.281 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.713 | 35.452 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 37.743 | 61.984 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2010 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2273 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3019 | 3246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2010 | 1105 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2273 | 1974 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3019 | 3246 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
Intel UHD Graphics P630 | NVIDIA Quadro K4100M | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1095 | 1086 |
Genre | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Architecture | Kepler | |
Nom de code | GK104 | |
Date de sortie | 23 July 2013 | |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1,499 | |
Prix maintenant | $379.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 9.50 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 706 MHz |
Pipelines | 24 | 1152 |
Performance á point flottant | 1,627 gflops | |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 67.78 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | |
Compte de transistor | 3,540 million | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 128 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 102.4 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Vitesse de mémoire | 3200 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Quick Sync | ||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus | ||
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | |
Taille du laptop | large |