Intel UHD Graphics P750 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics P750 and NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics P750
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 878x more texture fill rate: 57.60 GTexel/s vs 65.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 55 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 449 vs 380
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 2021 vs 11 January 2017 |
| Texture fill rate | 57.60 GTexel/s vs 65.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 55 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 449 vs 380 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1025 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 4x more pipelines: 1024 vs 256
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4284 vs 1663
- 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16429 vs 6538
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1025 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1024 vs 256 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4284 vs 1663 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 16429 vs 6538 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics P750
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 449 | 380 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1663 | 4284 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6538 | 16429 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6337 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics P750 | NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | Rocket Lake GT1 | GM206 |
| Launch date | 2021 | 11 January 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 476 | 473 |
| Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 300 MHz | 1025 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 115.2 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 921.6 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 460.8 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 1024 |
| Pixel fill rate | 28.80 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 57.60 GTexel/s | 65.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Floating-point performance | 2,099 gflops | |
| Transistor count | 2,940 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 88 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 5500 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |

