Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU) vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Comparative analysis of Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Video outputs and ports, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 17 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 642.9x more texture fill rate: 21.6 GTexel/s vs 33.6 billion / sec
- 2.3x more pipelines: 256 vs 112
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 65 nm
- 7x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 105 Watt
| Launch date | 2021 vs 29 October 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel/s vs 33.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 256 vs 112 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 105 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 350 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 463 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 49 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU) | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 12.1 | Tesla |
| Launch date | 2021 | 29 October 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 1399 |
| Code name | G92 | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1350 MHz | |
| Compute units | 32 | |
| Core clock speed | 350 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 65 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 172.8 GFLOPS (1:4) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1382 GFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 691.2 GFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 256 | 112 |
| Pixel fill rate | 10.8 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 21.6 GTexel/s | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 105 Watt |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Floating-point performance | 336.0 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
| Transistor count | 754 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | IGP | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel UHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU) with others
IntelUHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU) vs
IntelUHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 16 EU)
IntelUHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU) vs
IntelUHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
IntelUHD Graphics (Tiger Lake 32 EU) vs
IntelUHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 32 EU)
