NVIDIA CMP 30HX vs AMD FireStream 9250
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA CMP 30HX and AMD FireStream 9250 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA CMP 30HX
- Videocard is newer: launch date 12 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1530 MHz vs 625 MHz
- 6284x more texture fill rate: 157.1 GTexel/s vs 25 GTexel / s
- Around 76% higher pipelines: 1408 vs 800
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 125 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 6x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 1 GB
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 vs 16 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz vs 625 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s vs 25 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1408 vs 800 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 55 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 1 GB |
Reasons to consider the AMD FireStream 9250
- Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1986 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA CMP 30HX
GPU 2: AMD FireStream 9250
Name | NVIDIA CMP 30HX | AMD FireStream 9250 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 68128 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1165 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 465 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX | AMD FireStream 9250 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | TeraScale |
Code name | TU116 | RV770 |
Launch date | 25 Feb 2021 | 16 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 295 | 305 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1785 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1530 MHz | 625 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 1408 | 800 |
Pixel fill rate | 85.68 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 157.1 GTexel/s | 25 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 125 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 6600 million | 956 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | |
Height | 35 mm, 1.4 inches | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x4 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm, 9 inches | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
Width | 111 mm, 4.4 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 336.0 GB/s | 63.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective | 1986 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |