NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs ATI FireGL V7200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K240Q and ATI FireGL V7200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K240Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 8 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 9.9x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.8x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1300 MHz
- 21.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2541 vs 116
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 June 2013 vs 1 October 2005 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 9.6 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 1300 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2541 vs 116 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V7200
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 348 vs 212
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 348 vs 212 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K240Q
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V7200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID K240Q | ATI FireGL V7200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2541 | 116 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6935 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6935 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3938 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3938 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3667 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3667 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID K240Q | ATI FireGL V7200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | R500 |
| Code name | GK104 | R520 |
| Launch date | 28 June 2013 | 1 October 2005 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $469 | $1,279 |
| Place in performance rating | 489 | 492 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s | 9.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 321 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 41.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
