NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GRID K240Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GRID K240Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

NVIDIA GRID K240Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 745 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6322 vs 2541
3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 648 vs 212
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 6935
Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 6935

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	25 October 2016 vs 28 June 2013
Core clock speed	1392 MHz vs 745 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6322 vs 2541
PassMark - G2D Mark	648 vs 212
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8496 vs 6935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8496 vs 6935

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K240Q

Around 43% higher texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
Around 7% better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
714.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3938 vs 3687
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3667 vs 3336
Around 7% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3938 vs 3687
Around 10% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3667 vs 3336

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	95.36 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
Pipelines	1536 vs 768
Floating-point performance	2,289 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
Memory clock speed	5000 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3938 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3667 vs 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3938 vs 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3667 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K240Q

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6322

2541

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

648

212

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8496

6935

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3687

3938

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3336

3667

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

8496

6935

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3687

3938

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3336

3667

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)	NVIDIA GRID K240Q
PassMark - G3D Mark	6322	2541
PassMark - G2D Mark	648	212
Geekbench - OpenCL	20734
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8496	6935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3687	3938
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3336	3667
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8496	6935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3687	3938
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3336	3667
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	306

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)	NVIDIA GRID K240Q
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Kepler
Code name	GP107	GK104
Launch date	25 October 2016	28 June 2013
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	$469
Place in performance rating	495	498
Price now	$159.99
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Value for money (0-100)	46.07
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz
Core clock speed	1392 MHz	745 MHz
CUDA cores	768
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops	2,289 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C
Pipelines	768	1536
Texture fill rate	66.82 GTexel / s	95.36 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	225 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	3,540 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	No outputs
G-SYNC support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	145 mm
Supplementary power connectors	None
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB / s	160.0 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	5000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready