NVIDIA GRID K240Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K240Q and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K240Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 24% higher texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 76.8 billion / sec
  • 6x more pipelines: 1536 vs 2x 128
  • 3x better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
  • 5x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
  • 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2541 vs 798
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3667 vs 3238
  • Around 13% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3667 vs 3238
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 June 2013 vs 18 March 2008
Texture fill rate 95.36 GTexel / s vs 76.8 billion / sec
Pipelines 1536 vs 2x 128
Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops vs 2x 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 65 nm
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 1000 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 2541 vs 798
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3667 vs 3238
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3667 vs 3238

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

  • 2x more core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 745 MHz
  • Around 14% lower typical power consumption: 197 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • 2.4x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 vs 212
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1500 MHz vs 745 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 197 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 518 vs 212

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K240Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2541
798
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
212
518
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3667
3238
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3667
3238
Name NVIDIA GRID K240Q NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2
PassMark - G3D Mark 2541 798
PassMark - G2D Mark 212 518
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6935
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6935
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3938
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3938
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3667 3238
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3667 3238

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GRID K240Q NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Tesla
Code name GK104 G92
Launch date 28 June 2013 18 March 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $469 $599
Place in performance rating 491 488
Type Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Core clock speed 745 MHz 1500 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops 2x 384.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 65 nm
Pipelines 1536 2x 128
Texture fill rate 95.36 GTexel / s 76.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 197 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 754 million
CUDA cores 256 (128 per GPU)
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, HDMIDual Link DVI
Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
SLI options Quad
Supplementary power connectors 6-pin & 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2x 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s 128 (64 per GPU)
Memory bus width 256 Bit 512 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 1000 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
SLI