NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K260Q and NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K260Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 300 MHz
- 39.7x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 110 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 128 MB
- 10x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 36.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2949 vs 81
- Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 294
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 vs 9 August 2004 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 110 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2949 vs 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 294 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
- 9x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 225 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 540
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K260Q | NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2949 | 81 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 294 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1898 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1898 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1954 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q | NVIDIA Quadro FX 540 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Curie |
Code name | GK104 | NV43 A2 |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 | 9 August 2004 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $937 | $299 |
Place in performance rating | 548 | 550 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Price now | $59.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 1.71 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 300 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 110 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 146 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 198 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 8 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 500 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |