NVIDIA Quadro K2200M vs NVIDIA GRID K260Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K2200M and NVIDIA GRID K260Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3.5x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3469 vs 2949
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 384 vs 361
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3720 vs 1898
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3720 vs 1898
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3084 vs 1954
- Around 58% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3084 vs 1954
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 19 July 2014 vs 28 June 2013 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3469 vs 2949 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 vs 361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3084 vs 1954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3084 vs 1954 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K260Q
- Around 12% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 667 MHz
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 26.68 GTexel / s
- 2.4x more pipelines: 1536 vs 640
- 2.7x better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 853.8 gflops
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6474 vs 4750
- Around 36% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6474 vs 4750
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 667 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 26.68 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops vs 853.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 vs 4750 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 vs 4750 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID K260Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | NVIDIA GRID K260Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3469 | 2949 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 384 | 361 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 10787 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4750 | 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4750 | 6474 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3084 | 1954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3084 | 1954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M | NVIDIA GRID K260Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Code name | GM107 | GK104 |
Launch date | 19 July 2014 | 28 June 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 544 | 547 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $937 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 667 MHz | 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 853.8 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 26.68 GTexel / s | 95.36 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 3,540 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB / s | 160.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision Pro | ||
Mosaic | ||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |