NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon HD 8970M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K260Q and AMD Radeon HD 8970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K260Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
  • Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 72 GTexel / s
  • Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
  • Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6474 vs 2521
  • 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6474 vs 2521
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 28 June 2013 vs 14 May 2013
Texture fill rate 95.36 GTexel / s vs 72 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 1280
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6474 vs 2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6474 vs 2521

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8970M

  • Around 14% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 745 MHz
  • Around 1% better floating-point performance: 2,304 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
  • 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3876 vs 2949
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 361
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 1898
  • Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 1898
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2595 vs 1954
  • Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2595 vs 1954
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 850 MHz vs 745 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,304 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3876 vs 2949
PassMark - G2D Mark 807 vs 361
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3688 vs 1898
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3688 vs 1898
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 2595 vs 1954
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 2595 vs 1954

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8970M

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
2949
3876
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
361
807
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6474
2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
6474
2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1898
3688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1898
3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1954
2595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
1954
2595
Name NVIDIA GRID K260Q AMD Radeon HD 8970M
PassMark - G3D Mark 2949 3876
PassMark - G2D Mark 361 807
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 6474 2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 6474 2521
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 1898 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 1898 3688
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1954 2595
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1954 2595
Geekbench - OpenCL 18661
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 57.241
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1223.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.78
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 89.306
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 268.643
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GRID K260Q AMD Radeon HD 8970M

Essentials

Architecture Kepler GCN 1.0
Code name GK104 Neptune
Launch date 28 June 2013 14 May 2013
Launch price (MSRP) $937
Place in performance rating 545 546
Type Workstation Desktop
Design AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series

Technical info

Core clock speed 745 MHz 850 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,289 gflops 2,304 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 1536 1280
Texture fill rate 95.36 GTexel / s 72 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 100 Watt
Transistor count 3,540 million 2,800 million
Boost clock speed 850 MHz
Compute units 20

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 11
OpenGL 4.6 4.5

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 4 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.0 GB / s 153.6 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5000 MHz 4800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0

Technologies

AMD Eyefinity
PowerTune
ZeroCore