NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs AMD Radeon HD 8970M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K260Q and AMD Radeon HD 8970M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K260Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 32% higher texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 72 GTexel / s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 1536 vs 1280
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6474 vs 2521
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6474 vs 2521
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 vs 14 May 2013 |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 72 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 1280 |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 vs 2521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 vs 2521 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8970M
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 850 MHz vs 745 MHz
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 2,304 gflops vs 2,289 gflops
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3876 vs 2949
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 807 vs 361
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3688 vs 1898
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3688 vs 1898
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2595 vs 1954
- Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2595 vs 1954
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 850 MHz vs 745 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,304 gflops vs 2,289 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3876 vs 2949 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 807 vs 361 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3688 vs 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3688 vs 1898 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2595 vs 1954 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2595 vs 1954 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8970M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID K260Q | AMD Radeon HD 8970M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2949 | 3876 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 807 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 | 2521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 | 2521 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1898 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1898 | 3688 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1954 | 2595 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1954 | 2595 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20588 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.241 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1223.742 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.78 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.306 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.643 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID K260Q | AMD Radeon HD 8970M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GK104 | Neptune |
Launch date | 28 June 2013 | 14 May 2013 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $937 | |
Place in performance rating | 552 | 553 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 8000M Series | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 850 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 1536 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s | 72 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,540 million | 2,800 million |
Boost clock speed | 850 MHz | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 153.6 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
PowerTune | ||
ZeroCore |