NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID K260Q and NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID K260Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 26% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 589 MHz
- 40.5x more texture fill rate: 95.36 GTexel / s vs 2.356 GTexel / s
- 192x more pipelines: 1536 vs 8
- 102x better floating-point performance: 2,289 gflops vs 22.432 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 5000 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 23.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2949 vs 126
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 361 vs 309
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 28 June 2013 vs 26 November 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 589 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s vs 2.356 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1536 vs 8 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops vs 22.432 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 40 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2949 vs 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 vs 309 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
- 7.3x lower typical power consumption: 31 Watt vs 225 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 31 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID K260Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID K260Q | NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2949 | 126 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 361 | 309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6474 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6474 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1898 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1898 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1954 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID K260Q | NVIDIA GeForce 205 OEM | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | GK104 | GT218 |
| Launch date | 28 June 2013 | 26 November 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $937 | |
| Place in performance rating | 552 | 555 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 589 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,289 gflops | 22.432 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 1536 | 8 |
| Texture fill rate | 95.36 GTexel / s | 2.356 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 31 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,540 million | 260 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.0 GB / s | 6.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR2 |

