NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q vs ATI Radeon E2400
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q and ATI Radeon E2400 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1033 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 21.8x more texture fill rate: 52.24 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s
- 16x more pipelines: 640 vs 40
- 34.8x better floating-point performance: 1,672 gflops vs 48 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 64x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 128 MB
- 3.7x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1400 MHz
- 33.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1756 vs 52
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 vs 28 June 2007 |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s vs 2.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 40 |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops vs 48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 128 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1756 vs 52 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon E2400
- 9x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 287 vs 228
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 287 vs 228 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q
GPU 2: ATI Radeon E2400
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q | ATI Radeon E2400 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 228 | 287 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1756 | 52 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID M10-8Q | ATI Radeon E2400 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | TeraScale |
Code name | GM107 | RV610 |
Launch date | 18 May 2016 | 28 June 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 572 | 569 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1306 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1033 MHz | 600 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,672 gflops | 48 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | 40 |
Texture fill rate | 52.24 GTexel / s | 2.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,870 million | 180 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 128 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 83.2 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |