NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q vs NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q and NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 15.1x more texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s
- 64x more pipelines: 2048 vs 32
- 60.4x better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 80 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 80 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
- 6.3x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 13.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3695 vs 270
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 13 March 2008 |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s vs 10 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 32 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops vs 80 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 80 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3695 vs 270 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
- Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 7.8x lower typical power consumption: 29 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Around 81% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 328 vs 181
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 29 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 328 vs 181 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3695 | 270 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | 328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6674 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6674 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q | NVIDIA GeForce 9650M GS | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Tesla |
| Code name | GM204 | G84 |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 13 March 2008 |
| Place in performance rating | 504 | 507 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 80 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 80 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 32 |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s | 10 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 29 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 289 million |
| CUDA cores | 32 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2?, GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
