NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 24% higher core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5320 vs 3695
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 vs 181
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 6674
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 6674
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 30 August 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1152 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5320 vs 3695 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 vs 181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 vs 6674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 vs 6674 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
- 2.2x more texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- 2.2x better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 2,177 gflops
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3579
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3579
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s vs 68.02 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops vs 2,177 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3579 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3579 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5320 | 3695 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 | 181 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19914 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | 6674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | 6674 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | GM204 |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 30 August 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 505 | 504 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz | 1180 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1152 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
| Texture fill rate | 68.02 GTexel / s | 151.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 160.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||

