NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q vs AMD FirePro W7000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q and AMD FirePro W7000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 76 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- Around 99% better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 2,432 gflops
- Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 4% higher memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 4800 MHz
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6674 vs 6475
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6674 vs 6475
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 13 June 2012 |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s vs 76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops vs 2,432 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 350 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 4800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6674 vs 6475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6674 vs 6475 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W7000
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 950 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4288 vs 3695
- 3x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 546 vs 181
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 950 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4288 vs 3695 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 546 vs 181 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W7000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q | AMD FirePro W7000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3695 | 4288 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | 546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6674 | 6475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6674 | 6475 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17771 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 52.467 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1148.367 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.886 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 85.472 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 268.49 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q | AMD FirePro W7000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | Pitcairn |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 13 June 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 512 | 510 |
| Type | Workstation | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 2,432 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s | 76 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 350 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 242 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q with others
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q vs
ATIRadeon X1950 PRO
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3500M
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q vs
AMDFirePro W7000
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740A
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850A
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q vs
AMDRadeon E9550 MXM
