NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q vs AMD Radeon HD 7950
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q and AMD Radeon HD 7950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 89.6 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- Around 69% better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 2,867 gflops
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 31 January 2012 |
Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s vs 89.6 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops vs 2,867 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 300 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3699 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7950
- Around 6% higher boost clock speed: 1250 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- 3x more maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7988 vs 6674
- Around 20% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7988 vs 6674
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 3 GB vs 1 GB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7988 vs 6674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7988 vs 6674 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3358 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7950
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 3695 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6674 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6674 | 7988 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3359 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 82144 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 63.74 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1177.395 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.685 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 69.23 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 343.81 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1914 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q | AMD Radeon HD 7950 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | GM204 | Tahiti |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 31 January 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 516 | 519 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon HD 7000 Series | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 2,867 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 1792 |
Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s | 89.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 300 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 4,313 million |
Compute units | 28 | |
Stream Processors | 1792 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
DisplayPort support | ||
Dual-link DVI support | ||
Eyefinity | ||
HDMI | ||
Number of Eyefinity displays | 6 | |
VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 2x 6-pin |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 11 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 3 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 240 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 1250 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
FreeSync | ||
PowerTune | ||
ZeroCore |