NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q vs AMD Radeon R9 270
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q and AMD Radeon R9 270 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- Around 28% higher boost clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 925 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 74 GTexel / s
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1280
- 2x better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 2,368 gflops
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 6674 vs 3448
- Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 6674 vs 3448
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 13 November 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s vs 74 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 1280 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops vs 2,368 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6674 vs 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6674 vs 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3347 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 270
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4306 vs 3695
- 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 567 vs 181
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 225 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4306 vs 3695 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 vs 181 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 270
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3695 | 4306 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | 567 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6674 | 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6674 | 3448 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3699 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3347 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3347 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74175 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 55.721 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1282.039 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.927 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 93.116 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 261.843 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1603 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q | AMD Radeon R9 270 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GM204 | Curacao |
| Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 13 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 504 | 501 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $179 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 2,368 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 1280 |
| Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s | 74 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 5,200 million | 2,800 million |
| Stream Processors | 1280 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | 210 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1 x 6-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 179.2 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q with others
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9650M GS
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q vs
AMDFirePro W7000
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q vs
AMDRadeon Sky 500
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 270
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
