NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 1085 MHz
- 3.5x more texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
- 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
- 3.5x better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
- 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5203 vs 2411
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5460 vs 5157
- Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5460 vs 5157
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 vs 13 March 2015 |
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz vs 1085 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 640 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops vs 1,389 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5203 vs 2411 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5460 vs 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5460 vs 5157 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
- Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 vs 311
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3526
- Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3526
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3350
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3350
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 631 vs 311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 5834 vs 3526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 5834 vs 3526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7859 vs 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7859 vs 3350 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5203 | 2411 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 311 | 631 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5460 | 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5460 | 5157 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3526 | 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3526 | 5834 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 | 7859 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 | 7859 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 12495 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 49.772 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 757.295 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.67 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 49.875 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 179.567 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Maxwell |
Code name | GM204 | GM107 |
Launch date | 30 August 2015 | 13 March 2015 |
Place in performance rating | 474 | 475 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1180 MHz | 1085 MHz |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1029 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops | 1,389 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 2048 | 640 |
Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s | 43.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 5,200 million | 1,870 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160.4 GB / s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |