NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1180 MHz vs 1085 MHz
  • 3.5x more texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
  • 3.2x more pipelines: 2048 vs 640
  • 3.5x better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
  • 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5203 vs 2411
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5460 vs 5157
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5460 vs 5157
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 30 August 2015 vs 13 March 2015
Boost clock speed 1180 MHz vs 1085 MHz
Texture fill rate 151.0 GTexel / s vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 2048 vs 640
Floating-point performance 4,833 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5203 vs 2411
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5460 vs 5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5460 vs 5157

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

  • Around 11% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 930 MHz
  • 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
  • 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 631 vs 311
  • Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 5834 vs 3526
  • Around 65% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 5834 vs 3526
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 7859 vs 3350
  • 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 7859 vs 3350
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 930 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 631 vs 311
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 5834 vs 3526
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 5834 vs 3526
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 7859 vs 3350
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 7859 vs 3350

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5203
2411
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
311
631
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5460
5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5460
5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3526
5834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3526
5834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
7859
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3350
7859
Name NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A
PassMark - G3D Mark 5203 2411
PassMark - G2D Mark 311 631
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 5460 5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 5460 5157
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3526 5834
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3526 5834
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3350 7859
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3350 7859
Geekbench - OpenCL 12495
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 49.772
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 757.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.67
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 49.875
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 179.567

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell 2.0 Maxwell
Code name GM204 GM107
Launch date 30 August 2015 13 March 2015
Place in performance rating 474 475
Type Workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1180 MHz 1085 MHz
Core clock speed 930 MHz 1029 MHz
Floating-point performance 4,833 gflops 1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 2048 640
Texture fill rate 151.0 GTexel / s 43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 75 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million 1,870 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 160.4 GB / s 80.19 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5