NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 18% higher boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 1180 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 225 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6316 vs 5203
- 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 648 vs 311
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 5460
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 3526
- Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 5460
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 3526
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 30 August 2015 |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 1180 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6316 vs 5203 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 648 vs 311 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 5460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 3526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 5460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 3526 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 151.0 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- 2.3x better floating-point performance: 4,833 gflops vs 2,138 gflops
- 716x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 7 GB/s
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 151.0 GTexel / s vs 66.82 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 4,833 gflops vs 2,138 gflops |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 7 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3350 vs 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3350 vs 3336 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6316 | 5203 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 648 | 311 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20698 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 5460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3350 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 5460 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3526 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3350 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2337 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) | NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Maxwell 2.0 |
Code name | GP107 | GM204 |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 30 August 2015 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $139 | |
Place in performance rating | 482 | 483 |
Price now | $159.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 46.07 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | 1180 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1392 MHz | 930 MHz |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,138 gflops | 4,833 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 66.82 GTexel / s | 151.0 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 225 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 5,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 160.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7 GB/s | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |